Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Unacceptable Bob's avatar

Exponential has a mathematical definition, but why is it used as if it were a synonym for 'devastating'? Relatively few phenomena in nature follow an exponential function, yet they can be devastating. When dealing with complex systems, mathematicians are out of their league and can only speculate as to what might happen.

There are hyperbolic functions which leave exponential functions in the dust conceptually, but we rarely hear about them. Lest an accusation be made of someone being hyperbolic.

If it is implied that 'predicament' includes a positive outcome, then 'opportunity' is perceived. In that case 'predicament' is no worse than 'problem'.

Sorry for being pedantic, but I'm tired of exponential this and exponential that, and invented terms like polycrisis. The plural of crisis is crises. Most people are not mathematicians, or actuaries, so they lack those perspectives. People are not going to wake up until they experience what words inadequately convey.

p.s. When I was young I considered a career as an electronics technician. But as surface mount technology came into being, the need to repair circuits dwindled, assuming you could physically do so.

Expand full comment
Joe Clarkson's avatar

Off-grid permaculturalists are not going to save the world, but they just might save themselves. Collapse is coming, no doubt, and overshoot will be resolved with a mass dieoff of humans, but if the dieoff happens fairly soon and we avoid a nuclear winter, enough of the biosphere will remain to allow low-energy subsistence agriculture as a livelihood. It won't be easy or bucolic, but it offers the best chance of survival.

In the meantime, before collapse, permaculture (or any low-energy horticulture) does little harm and may actually do some good in terms of soil fertility and biodiversity.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts